<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: N55 to replace N54</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eastbounddown.com/2010/01/n55-to-replace-n54/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eastbounddown.com/2010/01/n55-to-replace-n54/</link>
	<description>The world of motoring....with a twist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 16:26:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Financer</title>
		<link>http://eastbounddown.com/2010/01/n55-to-replace-n54/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>The Financer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eastbounddown.com/?p=2634#comment-415</guid>
		<description>Interesting info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrisdd</title>
		<link>http://eastbounddown.com/2010/01/n55-to-replace-n54/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrisdd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eastbounddown.com/?p=2634#comment-413</guid>
		<description>Think about this one people...already talk from the big wigs, through the grapevine, as to why the replacement...not only to comply with better emissions standards as well as the public&#039;s yearning for better mpg, but it&#039;s all about the money! Cheaper to produce and potentially maintain. If they could, they would&#039;ve put n55 with more power in the IS cars but the N54 performance kits have passed US and international emissions standards long ago...meaning they have paid their dues for standardizing it already. That just means they&#039;re trying to get the last invested drops out of this powerplant because it is cost effective and they don&#039;t need to pay to re-standardize an n55 with more power (it costs millions of dollars to do this). Car companies are being very careful how they spend their money these days. A little birdie already told me a stock N55 is out performing the N54 /w an oem performance kit on the track,,,45lbs lighter and more responsive out of the corners...not to mention it runs much cooler than an n54 :)  Yowza!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think about this one people&#8230;already talk from the big wigs, through the grapevine, as to why the replacement&#8230;not only to comply with better emissions standards as well as the public&#8217;s yearning for better mpg, but it&#8217;s all about the money! Cheaper to produce and potentially maintain. If they could, they would&#8217;ve put n55 with more power in the IS cars but the N54 performance kits have passed US and international emissions standards long ago&#8230;meaning they have paid their dues for standardizing it already. That just means they&#8217;re trying to get the last invested drops out of this powerplant because it is cost effective and they don&#8217;t need to pay to re-standardize an n55 with more power (it costs millions of dollars to do this). Car companies are being very careful how they spend their money these days. A little birdie already told me a stock N55 is out performing the N54 /w an oem performance kit on the track,,,45lbs lighter and more responsive out of the corners&#8230;not to mention it runs much cooler than an n54 <img src='http://eastbounddown.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Yowza!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldBooster</title>
		<link>http://eastbounddown.com/2010/01/n55-to-replace-n54/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>OldBooster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eastbounddown.com/?p=2634#comment-279</guid>
		<description>I have the fastest, quickest N54 on the planet, in a 135i, according to Dragtimes.com and the enthusiast forums: 11.2 ET @ 127 MPH .... over 500 WHP with stock turbos and a bunch of bolt-on mods. I can say the N54 has a lot of potential ... but stock is not overrated at 300 crankshaft HP. Stock, my 135i recorded only 258 HP at the rear wheels. Add the JuiceBox3 tune, and other items, and it goes up from there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the fastest, quickest N54 on the planet, in a 135i, according to Dragtimes.com and the enthusiast forums: 11.2 ET @ 127 MPH &#8230;. over 500 WHP with stock turbos and a bunch of bolt-on mods. I can say the N54 has a lot of potential &#8230; but stock is not overrated at 300 crankshaft HP. Stock, my 135i recorded only 258 HP at the rear wheels. Add the JuiceBox3 tune, and other items, and it goes up from there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://eastbounddown.com/2010/01/n55-to-replace-n54/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eastbounddown.com/?p=2634#comment-257</guid>
		<description>Sounds good, because I just went out today and ordered a 2010 335xi Sedan.  I hope I&#039;m making the right decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds good, because I just went out today and ordered a 2010 335xi Sedan.  I hope I&#8217;m making the right decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Financer</title>
		<link>http://eastbounddown.com/2010/01/n55-to-replace-n54/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>The Financer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eastbounddown.com/?p=2634#comment-247</guid>
		<description>The 2010 335i Sedan has the N54 (i.e. the twin turbo) engine.  The 2011 though will have the N55 engine (the new single turbo).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2010 335i Sedan has the N54 (i.e. the twin turbo) engine.  The 2011 though will have the N55 engine (the new single turbo).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://eastbounddown.com/2010/01/n55-to-replace-n54/comment-page-1/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 07:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eastbounddown.com/?p=2634#comment-246</guid>
		<description>So which engine is the 2010 335i Sedan using?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So which engine is the 2010 335i Sedan using?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Financer</title>
		<link>http://eastbounddown.com/2010/01/n55-to-replace-n54/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>The Financer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eastbounddown.com/?p=2634#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Fair enough.  You could still make the argument that the popular EU models are all underpowered (i.e. they sell a hell of a lot more 318&#039;s than 335s)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough.  You could still make the argument that the popular EU models are all underpowered (i.e. they sell a hell of a lot more 318&#8242;s than 335s)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Greco</title>
		<link>http://eastbounddown.com/2010/01/n55-to-replace-n54/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>John Greco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eastbounddown.com/?p=2634#comment-166</guid>
		<description>BMW has always offered varying degrees of power, and cost has been a factor in the content of the vehicles since the 1st Lexus LS400 debuted.  So I don&#039;t think this development tarnishes the Ultimate Driving Machine mantra.  An EU market E38 728i was arguably underpowered, but was still a satisfying drive for an enthusiast minded individual.  

Big power is nice, and I certainly want my BMW to have an N54 rather than an N55, but big power isn&#039;t an essential part of the Ultimate Driving Machine recipe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BMW has always offered varying degrees of power, and cost has been a factor in the content of the vehicles since the 1st Lexus LS400 debuted.  So I don&#8217;t think this development tarnishes the Ultimate Driving Machine mantra.  An EU market E38 728i was arguably underpowered, but was still a satisfying drive for an enthusiast minded individual.  </p>
<p>Big power is nice, and I certainly want my BMW to have an N54 rather than an N55, but big power isn&#8217;t an essential part of the Ultimate Driving Machine recipe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Financer</title>
		<link>http://eastbounddown.com/2010/01/n55-to-replace-n54/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>The Financer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eastbounddown.com/?p=2634#comment-162</guid>
		<description>I pretty much agree with you....that is why it is somewhat concerning to see them switching to the N55.  BMW is supposed to be the ultimate driving maching.  But maybe now the M models and IS models will be, but not all of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I pretty much agree with you&#8230;.that is why it is somewhat concerning to see them switching to the N55.  BMW is supposed to be the ultimate driving maching.  But maybe now the M models and IS models will be, but not all of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Greco</title>
		<link>http://eastbounddown.com/2010/01/n55-to-replace-n54/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>John Greco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eastbounddown.com/?p=2634#comment-161</guid>
		<description>The N54 is also spec&#039;d for the brand new 740i and 740Li, per a press release that called the engine a &quot;twin turbocharged&quot; I6, rather than the using the amusing &quot;Mono Turbo&quot; or &quot;TwinPower Turbo&quot; monikers.  

I don&#039;t buy the excuse that &quot;the N55 doesn&#039;t need two turbos because its single turbo is a twin scroll unit.&quot; It has to be a cost and weight savings thing, right?  Because basically, all the serious BMWs are keeping the N54, and it&#039;s not just existing models - newly introduced serious BMWs are geetting the N54.  

 It is also worth noting The N54&#039;s 300hp/300lb-ft numbers are widely thought to be underrated.  I think I&#039;m on pretty safe ground predicting that the N55&#039;s 300hp/300lb-ft numbers are not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The N54 is also spec&#8217;d for the brand new 740i and 740Li, per a press release that called the engine a &#8220;twin turbocharged&#8221; I6, rather than the using the amusing &#8220;Mono Turbo&#8221; or &#8220;TwinPower Turbo&#8221; monikers.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t buy the excuse that &#8220;the N55 doesn&#8217;t need two turbos because its single turbo is a twin scroll unit.&#8221; It has to be a cost and weight savings thing, right?  Because basically, all the serious BMWs are keeping the N54, and it&#8217;s not just existing models &#8211; newly introduced serious BMWs are geetting the N54.  </p>
<p> It is also worth noting The N54&#8242;s 300hp/300lb-ft numbers are widely thought to be underrated.  I think I&#8217;m on pretty safe ground predicting that the N55&#8242;s 300hp/300lb-ft numbers are not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
